Regulation SHO
Short Selling Regulation
“Our agency’s rules have long been supportive of short selling, which can help quickly transmit price signals in response to negative information or prospects for a company. Short selling helps prevent ‘irrational exuberance’ and bubbles. Continued legitimate short selling …will act, as it is supposed to, as a way for market participants to invest in the downside and to hedge other positions.”
Former SEC Chairman Christopher Cox July 24, 2008(46)
Taking a short position has been, and continues to be, more heavily regulated than taking a long position. The SEC is vigilant about taking actions against wrongdoers, working independently or in conjunction with the self-regulatory organizations (SROs) and other regulatory authorities.
During the Roaring Twenties, companies often sold securities based on dazzling promises of incredible profits without disclosing meaningful information to investors. Following the stock market crash of 1929, Congress passed the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Section 10(a) of the 1934 act made it unlawful for any person to effect a short sale of any security registered on an exchange in contravention of SEC rules.
In 1938, following a sharp drop in the stock market, the SEC enacted Rule 10a-1, which included a “tick test” that was designed to restrict short selling in a declining market. An investor could only take a short position at a price above the price at which the immediately preceding sale was affected (“plus tick”), or at the last sale price if it was higher than the last different price (“zero-plus tick”).(47)
Over many years and in many economic and global crises, the SEC has acknowledged the significant benefits of short selling to market liquidity and pricing efficiency,(48) and until July 2008 regulated it with measured rules, adopted after substantial consideration and public comment.(49)
In 2004, the SEC approved Regulation SHO, which targeted “naked” short sales and both simplified and modernized short-sale regulation. The framework’s objectives are:
- “[E]stablish uniform locate and delivery requirements in order to address problems associated with failures to deliver, including potentially abusive ‘naked’ short selling (i.e., selling short without having borrowed the securities to make delivery);
- “[C]reate uniform marking requirements for sales of all equity securities; and,
- “[E]stablish a procedure to temporarily suspend Commission and SRO short sale price tests in order to evaluate the overall effectiveness and necessity of such restriction.”(50)
Compliance with Regulation SHO became effective January 3, 2005.
“Naked” short selling is not defined in federal securities laws, but generally refers to selling short without having borrowed or arranged to borrow the securities to make delivery. This can result in the failure of the seller to deliver securities to the buyer on the date delivery is due (known as “failure to deliver” or a “fail”).(56)
Selling stock short without having borrowed the stock or located the stock for delivery at settlement would violate Regulation SHO (except for short sales by broker-dealers engaged in bona fide market making). Further, naked shorting as part of a manipulative scheme with the purpose of driving down a security’s price would violate various securities laws (including Rule 10b-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) and both civil and criminal anti-fraud statutes.(57)
“While there may be instances of abusive short selling, 99 percent of all trades in dollar value settle on time without incident,” according to an SEC official.(58) Of all those that do not, 85 percent are resolved within 10 business days and 90 percent within 20 business days.
CONTINUE