SEC Reporting

Why Reporting to the SEC Makes Sense but Broader Requirements Would be Harmful

The SEC has the right to obtain and review confidential information about short positions for market surveillance purposes, but forcing public disclosure of individual positions of investment managers would have multiple serious consequences for the market.

Public disclosure will cause competitive harm. Institutional investment managers could suffer competitive harm if their short sale positions were disclosed to the public. Investment managers employing a fundamental short strategy seek to identify overvalued equities. They conduct rigorous, costly financial analyses that focus on whether an issuer has an unsustainable or operationally flawed business plan, has materially overstated earnings, or otherwise engaged in fraud. As a former chief economist for the Commission has noted, disclosure of short positions would allow some traders to be “free riders,” copying the positions of others, and benefiting themselves while reducing the gains that would otherwise accrue to those that actually performed the research.(106)

Public disclosure of short positions in equity securities could shift trading to less transparent markets and compromise strategies. Public disclosure could result in the transfer of short sale activity to less transparent markets, such as those for swaps, credit default swaps, and other derivative transactions.

Public disclosure exposes financial institutions to retaliation. Public disclosure of short positions would unfairly expose financial institutions to retaliation by companies and the risk of “short squeeze” campaigns. a squeeze can result in substantial losses for a financial institution holding a short position and lead to increased volatility.(107) Public disclosure would expose financial institutions to retaliation as issuers cut off communications with analysts at institutions who report short positions in the issuers’ securities.

Public disclosure may confuse investors. Short selling in a company’s stock can occur for a variety of reasons and not necessarily because the short seller has a negative view of a company’s outlook. For example, a financial institution may take a short position to lock in a spread or hedge an investment in convertible bonds by shorting the same company’s equity. Traders also buy options and/or futures on stock indices and then short the individual component equities in order to profit from arbitrage opportunities. In these instances, public disclosure of short sale positions may mislead investors, who may incorrectly assume that the institution has a negative view of the company whose stock is being shorted.

CPIC believes that the SEC should have the information that it needs in order to police the securities markets.(108) However, the SEC should consider alternatives to requiring public filing of such data. For example, short sellers could be required to retain and make available for SEC inspection detailed books and records relating to their short sale activity. This alternative would preserve confidentiality while providing the SEC with necessary data on short sale activities.

CONTINUE

SEC Reporting

106. “Cox Seeks Emergency Disclosure Rule; Market, Hedge Funds React With Dismay,” BNA, Inc. Daily Report for Executives, No. 182 at p. A-33, Sept. 19, 2008. (“Chester S. Spatt, a finance professor at Carnegie Mellon University and a former chief economist for the SEC…agreed that the proposed disclosure would allow other short sellers to imitate very quickly the trades of the hedge fund disclosing its short position, resulting in the hedge fund not being able to reap the full benefit of the information it produced.”)

107. Jeffrey Cane, “VW Über Alles,” Portfolio. Oct. 28, 2008. Available at: http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/10/28/Volkswagen-Is-the-Biggest-Company. (“Automakers everywhere are getting battered by an economic slowdown, but today Europe’s top carmaker is the biggest company in the world. Because of a freak event, shares of Volkswagen have spiked, giving it a market value of $370 billion, surpassing that of Exxon Mobil...On Sunday, Porsche unexpectedly disclosed that it had raised its stake in Volkswagen to 74.1 percent from 35 percent, through the use of derivatives…The price spike resulted from a squeeze. A number of hedge funds had shorted VW shares, betting that the company, like other automakers, would fall in the market as consumers cut back spending.”); Sarah Marsh, “Short Sellers Make VW the World’s Priciest Firm,” Reuters. Oct. 28, 2008. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSTRE49R3I920081028.

108. CPIC Comment Letter, op. cit. footnote 76.